Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interactive Brokers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Jytdog (talk) 02:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interactive Brokers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are mostly press releases; the key aspect of GNG is that here are sufficient independent sources with substantial discussion with which to build an article. That the article "must" be built on press releases, as that is pretty much all there is, makes the article inherently promotional and not encyclopedic Jytdog (talk) 03:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A quick check reveals plenty of news coverage beyond press releases, such as this one. It is also frequently featured in global press due to consistently winning Barron's top broker awards. Article needs work, but sources are plentiful. Owen× ☎ 01:56, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. For reasons noted by OwenX. Confirmation of founding date and place would be nice, however... Doprendek (talk) 02:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am withdrawing this. Jytdog (talk) 02:49, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.