Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interior Semiotics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interior Semiotics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing enough substantial coverage of this outside of superficial jokes about hipsters. This isn't notable as art but was a blip-on-the-radar meme. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see any enduring historical significance. On 24 August 2016 Snopes debunked the claim that an edited version of the video showed a young woman seemingly struggling with the feat of opening a can of Spaghetti-O’s. Their report was Updated on 24 January 2018 and that is, I hope, the last we will ever hear of it. Vexations (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It isn't any artistic notability that is getting it in - references come from people making fun of hipsters, and I can't imagine that it some notability criteria for a particularly significant case of mocking hipsters. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A couple more decent refs and it would have been a different story, he said while struggling to open his can of Spaghetti-o's.104.163.158.37 (talk) 03:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.