Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intraboom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Sphilbrick under criterion A7. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 00:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Intraboom

Intraboom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Far too soon for this product. Refs are press releases or listings for an event at which it was showcased. No evidence of any third party reputable mentions.  Velella  Velella Talk   11:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intraboom, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.