Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invisible Wonder Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invisible Wonder Games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced only by iTunes, its own website, and a republisher of press releases. The only reason I don't tag it A7/G11 is in deference to the contributors who have handled the page over the years. Cabayi (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ping previous (non-bot, non-IP) contributors, X201, Katharineamy, Bearcat, Darkskynet, NatGertler -- Cabayi (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - weak Google results, dead website suggest that nothing of value has been gained since I tagged it for notability six years ago. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. X201 (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The VG search engine returns nothing. Delete for lack of notability. --Izno (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. To qualify for a Wikipedia article, a video game development company needs to be referenced to reliable source coverage about the company — but this is sourced entirely to its own self-published content about itself, including press releases and the buy-it or play-it links to its own games on app stores and Flash game sites. This is not how you source a company as notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 15:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't pass any version of WP:GNG. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺12:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.