Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iopolis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iopolis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged unsourced for a long time and please see talk page. Perhaps a joke by a Battlestar Galactica fan? Chidgk1 (talk) 16:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing on it. Xegma(talk) 17:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment found a source and corrected information on the page however I'm unsure if it's notable enough to deserve a wikipedia page Pothos144 (talk) 23:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The source referenced in the article amounts to a single sentence in an encyclopedic reference of a different topic altogether. cyberdog958^Talk 00:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is no encyclopedic development nor any notoriety in the way of writing, sorry, it must be eliminated. Alon9393 (talk) 08:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.