Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irène Major

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 00:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Irène Major

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have tidied this page up and it has left nothing. There are no references, and whatever claims remain do not confer notability. Article and associated pages (newly created French reality TV show page and now deleted band page) have been created and maintained by SPA/COI editors and are of generally poor quality. The only time I've encountered her is on one of those Channel 5 shows about the super-rich. Very limited press. Examples of coverage in mainstream media are trivial and not enough to show notability: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2850927/As-Holland-Barrett-come-fire-selling-controversial-skin-lightening-cream-women-wholl-whiter-skin.html and http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mortgageshome/article-3131594/Home-cinema-gold-leaf-plasterwork-hair-salon-X-Factor-star-s-Principal-House-goes-sale.html Her biggest achievement seems to be the X Factor performance and performance there falls far short of one where it can be considered worthy of an article. Rayman60 (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.