Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ishing thingbi lake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 13:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ishing thingbi lake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am concerned that this does not meet the notability guidelines - though I could not locale a specific GNG subentry for rivers, lakes or waterways of any sort. This lake does not seem to have anything in the way of third party coverage according to a G-search, and on viewing it on the Google maps link it appears to be a very small body of water in the middle of a remote rural area that is - according to the scale - only 150-200ft wide. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 16:00, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 16:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable lake. May be it is a non notable lake located near Ishing thingbi village or area. Rayabhari (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/expand/merge: Article is purely a stub, so it could be merged with a bigger article, maybe? BlitzGreg (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it looks quite small with no references as such available. Size-wise we have no obligation of keeping as there seem to be bigger lakes in the neighbourhood unless this is popular with tourists/suiciders. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.