Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isis Taylor (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isis Taylor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taylor is a throughly undistinguished pornographic film actor. Her awards are what one expects from an industry that gives out awards left, right and center. The gossipy coverage of her being hired as an intern by Charlie Sheen is not enough to justify an encyclopedia article. Back in 2011 this article was deleted and nothing has changed in the ensuing years to justify having it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She is a minor porn actress who has won a few minor internal porn industry backscratching awards and hung out with Charlie Sheen briefly. She is no more notable than the winner of the "Iowa Locksmith of the Year" award, which means not notable at all. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails PORNBIO and GNG. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 10:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO, no awards, just nominations. The Sheen-related coverage is barely a flicker, nowhere near GNG/BLP requirements. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 10:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Fails PORNBIO and the blip of tabloid coverage is 1E without ongoing interest. • Gene93k (talk) 11:50, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- non notable and fails GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- connection to a celebrity is NOTINHERITED. Doesn't meet GNG. Montanabw^(talk)
Delete as Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 02:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concur with Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Finnegas (talk) 19:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.