Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isis jade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 04:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isis jade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatantly non-notable. In fact, I couldn't find a single independent source about her. Not much else to say, really; obvious attempt at gaining notoriety through Wikipedia. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:V and WP:N, and being nothing but blatant advertising. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and comment Holy puffery Batman! There's nothing anywhere as the nominator stated to show how they are notable. I moved the page to Isis Jade to match the MOS for a proper name as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A clear example of WP:PROMOTION, subject lacks significant coverage by of reliable, third-party sources or secondary sources. Sources on the article are entirely primary and very brief. —Farix (t | c) 00:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete puffery. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - obviously non-notable. Blythwood (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly nothing for convincing notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.