Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isopress

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isopress

Isopress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First, this page has no sources. It's written confusingly by (whom I assume to be) a non-native English speaker, whom in all likely hood has a COI as this is one of the only pages the account that made the page edited, and is likely a SPA. Upon searching for Isopress it is difficult to find information on, and what I do find does not establish enough basically any notability for this to be warranted as a page. --Tautomers(T C) 06:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isopress, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.