Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itak Ekim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Itak Ekim

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the offline source (which does not have a page number listed for verifiability, nor can it be easily accessed), the citypopulation.de source doesn't list the village at all, and https://townsvillages.com/ng/okobo/ only lists the village's name with no other information. This is not sufficient to pass WP:GEOLAND. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article creator removed AfD tag, which I take as an objection to deletion, so relisting rather than soft deleting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Normally I would assume good faith about the offline ref, but given that the same editor added an online ref that did not verify the content it was supposed to be verifying (which I have now removed), I am not willing to do so in this case. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GEOLAND.4meter4 (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insuffecient RS - fails WP:GNG Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.