Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan J. Parron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ritmoteca.com. Stifle (talk) 17:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan J. Parron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable; only cited source comes from PRNewsWire, which I don't believe would be considered a reliable source. Google check and Highbeam check turns up no other sources. Article is vaguely (and occasionally not-so-vaguely) promotional in tone; I stripped out several external links from the body of the article as well as a long, context-less set of links at the bottom. Article has existed since 2011, but that seems more to do with just not having been noticed in that span of time than anything else. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; and redirect to Ritmoteca.com. No basis for notability, independent from that company (assuming that the company is notable, which may be a dubious proposition itself). Even the press release is only that 15 years ago he got an award from his alumni association, which is no big deal. TJRC (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I was actually just about to redirect Ritmoteca.com here as an alternative to speedy deleting it as excessively promotional. —Cryptic 21:49, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ritmoteca.com per arguments above. --Michig (talk) 08:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.