Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Klinec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 06:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Klinec

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of an academic who does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. Created by a single purpose account. Mccapra (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. GS cites negligible. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Fails the notability guidelines.--Darwinek (talk) 00:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NPROF, ANYBIO, and GNG. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 05:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I specifically logged in to vote delete for this article per above comments. Editorkamran (talk) 07:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of evidence of notability. Working at a national academy (as opposed to being honored by membership in one) does not give automatic notability, and I doubt chairing the Futurological Society in Slovakia does either. The article lists several publications that look like they might be books, but that would only provide notability if we could find multiple independent reviews of them, and my searches came up short. Indeed, the only links I could find for those titles seem to be derived from Wikipedia. Nothing else mentioned in the article even comes close. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.