Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JD Doyle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JD Doyle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. An overabundance of non-WP:IS leads me to lean on the NN side. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Radio, United States of America, and Texas. UtherSRG (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This leans far too heavily on primary sources that are not support for notability, and shows nowhere close to enough reliable source coverage about him and his work to get him over WP:GNG for it. Bearcat (talk) 19:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• *Delete Completely agree. Somehow this article has escaped scrutiny since the maintenance banner was placed questioning notability. This is an easy call. Delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 10:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.