Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JK Technosoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to J. K. Organisation. Star Mississippi 15:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JK Technosoft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

look like an advertisement Endrabcwizart (talk) 05:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Uttar Pradesh. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Previously declined at AfC under the name Draft:JK Tech. AllyD (talk) 07:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect: An article on an IT Services company under the J. K. Organisation. The references provided are predominantly announcement-based or about the parent group, along with several industry awards for this company which do not appear intrinsically notable. I agree with the earlier AfC reviewer that notability is not demonstrated. This company is mentioned in the article on the parent group, so a redirect to there could serve as a WP:ATD. AllyD (talk) 07:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The topic passes WP:NCORP based on the references that are accessible. JK Tech is a well-known brand in and of itself. Dhruvrathee22 (talk) 11:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to J. K. Organisation, where it is mentioned as ATD. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.