Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Rott (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Rott

Jacob Rott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NMODEL nor WP:NBASIC. I went through and cut everything that wasn't verified in the citations, but I cannot speak to the {{coi}} tag. None of the coverage, nor any other coverage that I could find satisfies notability as reliable, independent, AND significant. Bobby Cohn (talk) 14:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify or delete Delete if not enough sources, otherwise we can move it to draft. @Mirkomil Qodirov your participation is welcome. DACartman (talk) 23:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Rott (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.