Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Wiener

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Wiener

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Could not find significant coverage in reliable, third party sources. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 21:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete uncited BLP of minor - David Gerard (talk) 09:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not sure this person even exists; could be a hoax. (There are Australians named "Jacob Wiener" who might be the appropriate age, but it's a common enough name.) If he does exist, there is a total lack of sources. The linked video is a thirty-second TV ad which doesn't mention him by name. 2602:306:3A29:9B90:D0F5:535F:71B1:CA8 (talk) 10:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of sources. —MRD2014 (talk · contribs) 17:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no notability. Vincelord (talk) 16:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete, per above. It simply fails. seanhaley1 (talk) 23:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Suspicious account: Please note that the above contributor has recently created an account, rapidly made 10 edits and then started !voting on multiple AfDs, many of which don't make sense. See Special:Contributions/Seanhaley1 for their edits. There is a possibility that this is an undisclosed paid editor/canvassed editor/sockpuppet who is probably voting on multiple AfDs to hide the actual target. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable; and no WP:RS sources. Kierzek (talk) 19:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an article on a 10-year-old who apparently often appears in "local stage shows". I have no way of telling from the article if these are even professional productions, but clearly that is not enough to make the subject notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.