Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Jehanneuf
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Jacqueline Jehanneuf
- Jacqueline Jehanneuf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
per WP:GNG, cannot find any significant coverage on her. Also, doesn't appear to have significant roles or have a large fan base, so doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR either. LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (remark) @ 20:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (remark) @ 20:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. BenLinus1214talk 03:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - There's a couple of books on her but I'm not seeing much evidence of notability..... –Davey2010Talk 04:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.