Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Mya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 07:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jade Mya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially-toned WP:BLP of a musician, who has no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no strong sourcing for the purposes of clearing WP:GNG — the strongest claim here is of the "got X number of views on a piece of social media content" variety, which is not a Wikipedia inclusion freebie. She does not pass WP:NMUSIC #5 for having signed to Caroline Records, as her two existing albums were released independently, with her Caroline debut still forthcoming, and she does not pass NMUSIC #10 for the implications of a connection to the television series Nashville, because her music was never used in that series — her two independent releases consisted of covers of songs which were featured in that show via other people's versions rather than hers. And for referencing, this is sourced almost entirely to primary and unreliable sources and a Q&A interview in which she's speaking about herself rather than being written about in the third person by somebody other than her — literally the only acceptable reliable source here is a "local girl shoots for the big time" piece in her hometown's weekly community pennysaver. There's also a WP:COI, as the creator has been confirmed per the conflict of interest noticeboard as a paid PR editor. As always, Wikipedia is not a free publicity platform on which aspiring musicians get to have articles to help promote themselves while they try to make it — making it comes first and then the Wikipedia article follows, not vice versa. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she can be properly sourced as actually passing an NMUSIC criterion, but neither the sourcing nor the substance here are enough to already get her into Wikipedia today. Bearcat (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable singer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom fails WP:MUSICBIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.