Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagdpanzer MOWAG Cheetah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jagdpanzer MOWAG Cheetah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Only one prototype built. The Banner talk 22:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Banner talk 22:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "Only one built, fails GNG" is not how notability works. There's barely enough sourcing, but there is enough. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep: Passes WP:GNG Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 23:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. When we are already here though: move it and lose the CAPS. Geschichte (talk) 23:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "MOWAG" is the proper format of the name. The fact the article on the company is Mowag is frankly WP:OR. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Only one built, fails GNG" is not how notability works. Nüedi (talk) 14:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.