Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jai Simha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Linguist^unEins^uno 18:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Simha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy film notability guidelines (and that guideline was misinterpreted in moving from draft into article space). The film is in principal photography. Unreleased films that are in principal photography are only notable if the production itself is notable. This article says nothing about the production except that it is in progress. This article is therefore promotional.

The guideline is usually misinterpreted about films that are in principal photography, but it is still the guideline. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• How to Keep this article any suggestion, What is the mistake and changes to be done 10:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC) (talk)
• Keep: It does satisfy WP:NFF, just no editor has had the commitment to add more production details. --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Do you want me to add more references 10:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC) (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I am going according to Wikipidia guidilines, I also created several pages before, then where was the fault. Kindly tell me. Regards B.Bhargava Teja (talk) 13:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Move back to Draft space. Without in-depth discussion of the production (and that means a lot more than just routine announcements), this does not belong in Main space, for the reasons given by the nominator. If the film actually does get released next year, it can be moved back to Main space then. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I have removed the production column and kept it as routine announcements.B.Bhargava Teja (talk) 12:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.