Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Trotter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Trotter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't meet any of notability guidelines for biographical articles. Rotten regard 22:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Nomination came a solid seven minutes after article creation. Looks like there's well over 100 articles on Wikipedia that use this author as a reference. Clearly somebody out there thinks he's notable.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please tell me which notability guidelines he meets, where is the significant coverage talking about this person? Being a journalist doesn't make a person notable unless there is significant coverage written about them. --Rotten regard 22:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Passes WP:GNG due to extensive coverage in multiple media sources. A Google news search yeilds over 1,000 articles alone. Authorship of I Love Oklahoma/I Hate Texas lends to the material, as well as him being referenced in several scholarly papers What's Said in This Locker Room, Stays in This Locker Room and The NCAA Should Adopt a Uniform Student-Athlete Discipline Policy. All of these items are easily found by clicking the links provided above in the nomination's "Find sources" section. Please complete WP:BEFORE (specifically sections C and D) next time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 23:01, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those links indicate he doesn't come close to meeting the GNG, as he hasn't won any significant awards as a writer and no one has written extensively about him --Rotten regard 23:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with the first batch, but here are some additional references.

1. Rock Chalk Nation provides references as an expert
2. Sports Radio 560 interviews Jake Trotter for his expertise
3. Ty Hildenbrandt & Dan Rubenstein Big 12 Preview with Jake Trotter
4. Dallas Morning News quotes Jake Trotter as an expert on the Big 12
5. OklahomaSports.com talks with Jake Trotter on the subject of Big 12 football
6. LandThieves reviews Jake Trotter's book Why I Love Oklahoma & Hate Texas with excerpt
7. KFOR News Channel 4 Quotes Jake Trotter on Ben Grogan's successful field goal during an eqrthquake
8. The Lost Ogle article on The Oklahoman's newspaper writers going to ESPN, including Jake Trotter
9. Sooner Nation interviews Jake Trotter
10. Tulsa World Provides links to Jake Trotter's ESPN story base
11. West Virginia Mountaineers interview with Jake Trotter
12. Eer Sports ESPN's Jake Trotter Picks West Virginia to Upset Baylor
13. WIBW mentions Jake Trotter as a topic expert
14. Cincinati.com Interviews Jake Trotter as an expert

Some of those are "just fan blogs" but many are news sources (like WIBW and KFOR and Tulsa World and Cincinati.com) and many in-between. There are thousands more.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the sources listed above by Paul McDonald establish that the subject is notable and passes WP:GNG.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 05:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Paul McDonald (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Paul MacDonald.ShulMaven (talk) 01:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.