Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lorinz
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 10:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
James Lorinz
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- James Lorinz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable actor. Mostly unnamed characters, extras. Nothing at all significant and no coverage. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Does have some significant roles such as the lead in Frankenhooker and third billing in Street Trash which makes him worthy of an AFD rather than a prod, but not sure if he is notable yet so won't vote! yet, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete BLP article lacking even one reliable source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This article fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG because it lacks any sources and I could not find in a search any WP:SIGCOV of him as an actor, director, etc. He has had mostly small or unnamed roles, which clearly do not make him notable. The article has also been without any sources for 13 years. Newshunter12 (talk) 09:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.