Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James r hollands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James r hollands

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not sufficiently indicate how the subject is notable by Wikipedia's criteria. Google search for "james hollands" songwriter does not result in significant discussion. References provided do not mention the subject. I'm not disputing that he's co-written the songs, only that in itself it doesn't establish notability. ... discospinster _talk 15:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Self-promotion, therefore fails Wikipedia:Conflict of interest as well as GNG, SIGCOV, etc, etc. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 03:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He fails WP:CREATIVE badly. Even if everything is true, he's just your average songwriter. None of his songs appear to have been hits yet. As an actor, he has not appeared enough to be notable for his acting. His only remote "claim to fame"/notability is his work (once) with Mirotic. I didn't see anything special online. If something has changed, or we find more information, I'd be willing to change my !vote. Bearian (talk) 22:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The google search results don't show any WP:RS to establish the subject's notability and the subject created his own article which may be OK if he was notable. But he isn't, so he fails WP:N at present. In future, he may be notable and could merit his own article but not at the present time. --Artene50 (talk) 01:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above - SimonLyall (talk) 09:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:COMPOSER may have been met had he won either of these awards [1] [2], but he didn't. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.