Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Lindhe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Alexbrn (talk) 06:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Lindhe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person Alexbrn (talk) 19:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:Prof#C1 on GS cites. Would the nominator care to say if they have considered this issue and if not why not? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Indeed, seems to be a very notable figure in the field of periodontology. He even has an international conference named after him. – Joe (talk) 23:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. And an award named after him as well. Seems to be notable indeed within his field. If this is not the case, the nominator should probably explain why. /Julle (talk) 00:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is getting ridiculous. First Jorgen Slots and now Lindhe. Can we find an admin to kindly ask Alexbrn to quit trying to delete articles about famous dentists who he hasn't heard of? DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 04:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn. Clearly my search wasn't thorough enough - the person is notable enough. Alexbrn (talk) 05:53, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.