Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Nevin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus over notability, notwithstanding that it was nominated by a sock with no delete !votes Nosebagbear (talk) 12:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Janice Nevin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and sources discuss about his company instead of her. Portuportu2 (talk) 11:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Portuportu2 (talk) 11:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Of the five sources, three include her name in the titles. Are you sure they don't discuss her? pburka (talk) 20:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is only the second time I have participated in conversation about deletion, so I hope I have this right. I did not create this page, but I have expanded the article to include more coverage about her and to provide details about her background. Nevin has received wide coverage in her role as CEO of the ChristianaCare. I think the WP:THREE are (1) the 2014 Jen Rini The News Journal article, (2) "In The C-Suite: ChristianaCare CEO Dr. Janice Nevin". Delaware Business Times, and (3) the National Academy of Medicine article. While she is one of several interviewed during #3, the National Academy of Medicine is national coverage by a well-respected organization. --DaffodilOcean (talk) 02:21, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets WP:GNG. She is just as notable as many admins in Category:American hospital administrators. The sources, even before the expansion by DaffodilOcean, support this. Who is this 'him' mentioned in the nomination?--Ariel Cetrone (WMDC) (talk) 20:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Well-sourced, meets GNG. Gamaliel (talk) 14:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.