Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Russell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Janice Russell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Russell doesn't appear to meet out notability guidelines. The refs provided do nothing to show significant coverage in reliable sources: citing the author's own work, website, linked in profile, official website and books for sale on Amazon. My own searches show nothing else significant that isn't just promotional in nature. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 13:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I ran a proquest news archives search on: "Janice Russell " + "Keeping Abreast" and got only 1 hit, for an article by Russell (HEALTH: I `fought' my breast cancer but was I really brave? Not all women choose to seek treatment after being diagnosed - but they are just as deserving of respect, says Janice Russell; Russell, Janice. The Daily Telegraph [London (UK)] 28 Apr 1998: 16.) Flag me to take another look if anyone finds significant, secondary sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the lack of secondary sources. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not currently better satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.