Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janis Spindel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades ^Godric 06:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janis Spindel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable or significant coverage. Written like an advert to promote a business.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bytemanpacifist (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:BIO and WP:PROMO. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 05:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep Though I consider the subject matter frivolous, and the article needs an NPOV cleanup, she has received in-depth coverage for a number of years in the media as a "premier" matchmaker. [1] (forbes staff, not contributor), [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Icewhiz (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• keep this WP:PROMO. Edit it for POV and hype. I say this reluctantly, since even a quick gNews search reveals that she peddles "clairvoyant premonition(s)" [12]. Thing is: sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep--Pediaorg (talk) 19:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Contactpage Dlohcierekim 17:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Struck per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:38, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep for now - looks like it could be an article with work. Artw (talk) 17:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.