Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Carpenter
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Jared Carpenter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject contacted OTRS requesting deletion. The rationale essentially revolves around WP:BLP1E, and (reproduced with permission) from ticket:2013100710015384 is as follows: The article should be removed (...because it...) is based on a singular event in the lifetime of a low-profile, nonpublic individual whose role in the event is not significant or well-documented. Further, the Wiki article provides no context, and is based initially on three news articles in which I am not the main subject of any of the article, and, as of this date, only one of these articles is still available. I'd agree that this is a clear wholly negative BLP1E, probably created in the heat of the moment during the Abramoff scandal. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:44, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as not-notable.TheLongTone (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete If the scandal hadn't happened, would this be a notable individual? No. Case of BLP1E. Per nom. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:01, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BLP1E and a well-reasoned request to OTRS. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:30, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.