Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Dines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, the proposed target page for a redirect, Dissimulator (band), has been deleted so that is not an option. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Dines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG Cubbie15fan (talk) 04:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 08:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Before I start being rude and obnoxious, I'm going to ping a few other users on their opinion. @The Cross Bearer, Walter Görlitz and 3family6. --Metalworker14 (Yo) 14:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - First, you didn't {{ping}} us correctly. I checked for sources. The problem is that the coverage of the subject in reliable sources is not significant. It's brief mentions of his humour videos. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@The Cross Bearer:

Delete or simply Redirect to Dissimulator as either would be conceivable and I would've commented here sooner until I noticed this again a few moments ago. The listed sourcing is noticeable but still questionable as well for the independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 16:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or Delete: I am an inclusionist at my core, where I find no meat-on-the-bone with regards to the BLP in question, it can either be a redirect or outright deleted. It must have took tremendous work to cull up the sources with marginal mentions, where I give credit to whomever took the arduous time it took to put this biography together. However, he must have been individually covered in them, for me to advocate to keep the article in question. I am glad, I found this discussion, where the pings failed to notify me of the topic.The Cross Bearer (talk) 10:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.