Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Goedert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 21:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Goedert

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable minor league baseball player. He has bounced around the minors for some time and is unlikely to make the show. Spanneraol (talk) 20:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Spanneraol (talk) 20:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restore [1] and restore redirection Unscintillating (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He's no longer with that team so that makes no sense. Spanneraol (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that makes absolutely zero sense.--Yankees10 21:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What makes no sense is removing material from the encyclopedia from the target article and then un-redirecting and then bringing the topic to AfD with the argument that the topic is not notable, when the material could have been moved to a section on former players. Unscintillating (talk) 23:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page is for current players not former.--Yankees10 23:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What Yankees said; don't throw in comments if you have no clue what you're talking about. Wizardman 00:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've not made a policy-based argument. Yankees has not established him/herself as an authority...you see here a !vote from WP:ATA, the third in 3 AfDs I have seen today. WP:PRESERVE is a policy. I noticed you deleted John Whittleman this weekend, in the 2nd AfD; after you were a participant in the first AfD and !voted to delete. Do you have any comment about that? Unscintillating (talk) 01:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think we should add a section on former players? Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 02:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG not notable.--Yankees10 21:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep He has received a fairly significant amount of coverage (lots of it is routine, but still) and his five years at Triple-A seems somewhat notable. Alex (talk) 22:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"lots" of routine coverage doesn't equal passing GNG. Five years in AAA means nothing in regards to notability.--Yankees10 22:54, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then my vote will be canceled out by votes of opposite conviction, I am but a single person in a sea of Wikipedians. Alex (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing much that suggets he's notable. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 02:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 04:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 04:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (albeit weak) Coverage appears to be more than just "routine" -- see WP:NOTROUTINE essay for more details.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, all the sources used in the article are routine, sans perhaps the Kansas State one; if there was more on his college career that had strong references that might convince me. Wizardman 04:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.