Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Shavelson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Shavelson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Over 7,000 results.. But that's because of twitter, facebook, discography sites. Paint it Black is a notable band, but not the members. OccultZone (Talk) 07:00, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. OccultZone (Talk) 17:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. OccultZone (Talk) 17:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]

• Keep Two albums with professional reviews on AllMusic. That shows sufficient notability to me. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:32, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: How reviews decide WP:GNG? He is part of a notable band, so it may happen that one would comment on him, but how it makes him notable enough for having separate page. OccultZone (Talk) 02:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I misread the information. Those were band not solo album reviews. In which case it's still keep for WP:MUSICBIO 6 "is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles". Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You know that I can actually withdraw if someone provides me 1 source concerning the artist. You are encouraged to provide some good source. OccultZone (Talk) 03:32, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.