Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarrett Min Davis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jarrett Min Davis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete emerging artist maybe, but still emerging.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 00:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think WP:ACADEMIC applies, but searches turned up nothing to show they meet either WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Only found a couple of weak hits on books, and a brief mention on Scholar, other than that, zero. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well he is Associate Professor so WP:ACADEMIC applies but is not met.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I found some links at Books and browser but a better article can be made later. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.