Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Croot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Croot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP of an actor and director is poorly sourced and there is no claim of notability that meets WP:NACTOR. Current references are YouTube (looks like a self-published video), three interviews and IMDb. There are three more interviews listed in external links, so there's been a bit of interest in him, and he directed Le Fear on which we have an article, but I don't think he meets WP:GNG. I have carried out WP:BEFORE and not found reliable sources to add. Has been tagged with dubious notability since 2017. Possibly WP:TOOSOON? Tacyarg (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Film, Television, United Kingdom, and England. Tacyarg (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesnt meet the criteria for WP:SIGCOV. None of the current sources are reliable secondary sources either, just interviews. Subject does not pass WP:NACTOR --RealPharmer3 (talk) 12:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sources discussing him, Moviefone, fandango, imdb and the like. Social media hits, but no critical reviews, fails ACTOR. Oaktree b (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of WP:SIGCOV. There are no reliable sources, and therefore WP:BLP is violated. Even assuming that sources could be found, I don't see how the subject passes WP:NACTOR. We would need to see both better sources and more information of roles that justify inclusion. Bearian (talk) 15:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.