Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Schappert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep (NAC). Closing this because the nominator has withdrawn the nomination, AND nobody else has argued in favor of deleting, as outlined at WP:SK Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Schappert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity article. Fails WP:GNG and NAUTHOR John from Idegon (talk) 13:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 13:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 13:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Jacona (talk) 15:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Jacona (talk) 15:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Subject fails the basic notability guideline for people and is not found to be likely notable under the additional criteria for creative professionals. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. Schappert has received the Carnegie Medal, and has been discussed significantly for his teenage heroics saving a drowning man from the icy water, as AOPA's flight instructor of the year, for his books, videos, film, and for his innovative M0A flight school. The article certainly needs work, but the subject has received several national awards and much significant regional coverage. Plenty to qualify on gng. Jacona (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Kudos to JaconaFrere for taking the time, doing the research, expanding the article and adding the reliable and verifiable sources necessary to establish notability. Alansohn (talk) 16:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If we're passing compliments around, kudos to Alansohn for assuming good faith. I'd also like to thank John and Sam for all of their efforts; although I disagree with them on this article, they've both been very helpful to me in learning how to successfully edit Wikipedia, with the exception of articles that are associated with New Jersey. Thanks y'all! Jacona (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep thanks to Jacona, well done! Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. As per. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw per Jacona,. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John from Idegon (talk • contribs) 20:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.