Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jassim Haji (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 03:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jassim Haji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Fails Notability Test, person is certainly known, but does not pass the notability test outlined in wikipedia, news articles are either related to the employer, also the article reeks of self-promotion. His talks and interviews are done as an executive of the company, so it might be a good idea to the content of this page as part of the company. Seektrue (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there is a previous discussion on this page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Jassim Haji. clpo13_(talk) 16:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 16:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bahrain-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 16:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO. Wikipeida is not LinkedIn for hosting of subjects' resumes. The article does not present any indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.