Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javed Fiyaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Javed Fiyaz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Weak notability, written to promote the subject. Either need to completely rewritten but I failed to find reliable sources. There are some trivial mention in sources but not enough to start an article. Otherwise, he completely fails WP:ANYBIO as he has no achievement or award to his name. Thanks. Pollock's (talk) 18:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP The article has multiple issues including WP:NPOV and given WP:UNDUE weight to some activities, but I think the articles meets notability criteria. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the sources are almost universally horrible (including youtube, his website, and various hosting services), and while there may be one or two decent articles about him, I don't think this meets GNG. LittlePuppers (talk) 00:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article fails WP:GNG because its sources are either invalid (YouTube), self-published (his own website), or are trivial WP:ROUTINE coverage. There is a lack of enough WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate notability. The article is a thinly veiled attempt at promoting this individual despite his lack of notability. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.