Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javotti Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Extremely weak (irrelevant?) arguments from both sides of the debate, but the article does seem pretty shaky. I speculate that a re-nomination (but with a valid, policy-based statement) might yield a more thorough consensus. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Javotti Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No opinion from me, but an IP user placed the AfD tag so something needs to be here. ... discospinster _talk 02:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A list of trivial WP:FANCRUFT. 75.129.230.8 (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I can't believe my article is being nominated for deletion. It's not false. DBrown_SPS 02:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DBrown SPS: One reason to list it for deletion is because it needs additional references to support notability. I did a search and I see many hits for it. However, I don't know which of those sources is considered a RS in that music culture. Could you identify some better sources? LaMona (talk) 16:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@LaMona: I couldn't find any sources that match the notability of it. It was so much hard work to do. I tried, but didn't found anything that match the artists' names, the foundation nor its releases. DBrown_SPS 18:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DBrown SPS:I found these: Frank151, The Source, Fusicology, Rolling Stone. There are others, but I'm not sure which publications are considered key in this field. (Also, remember to sign your comments here with four tilde's, not by typing your username.] LaMona (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete - This article is filled with nothing, but nonsense. It should be removed and the user responsible for this page should be blocked. 75.129.230.8 (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. 75.129.230.8 (talk) 02:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 75.129.230.8 (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. 75.129.230.8 (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. 75.129.230.8 (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep We're talking about a label founded by a major artist. Why is this nominated lol? Ovo16 (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC) per WP:SOCKSTRIKE Kraxler (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - independent sources seem to exist, see [1] eg. shoy (reactions) 18:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - reads like a PR statement and needs better sourcing so WP:TNT may be in order. Kierzek (talk) 02:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep You can vote only once - I got all of the reference links I could find and added them to the page. It's just that it's not done yet. I need help. DBrown_SPS 23:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Talib Kweli as a compromise as although it's newly founded, it seems best known through Talib as shown here and here. If I were persuaded to keep, it would be a weak keep at best. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.