Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Pizzle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom's a sock and has been blocked so closing as SK, No objections to renomination by anyone in good standing. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Pizzle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Am afraid this might be a Conflict of interest. Account creation of this article looks like a sockpuppets of Coal Press Nation who have created~~

Jay Pizzle
Fliptyce
Ayo Jay
Tee-Y Mix

~~DJ Caise--~~Historical Ben (talk) 15:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The only popular Nigerian music award is The Headies, MTV Africa Music Award (The MAMAs) & Nigeria Entertainment Award (NEA Awards).. Winners or act nominated for this awards are mostly chosen based on popularity.. That to say the article passes criteria 8 of WP:MUSICIAN. Since Wikipedia did not note that the award must be a "major" so I don't think we should be adding our interpretation to it. I can also add that he has produced songs for many big names in the music industry. Jay Pizzle doesn't meet WP:GNG but has only one story on two newspapers.. Since the article meet's one out of all it's criteria, it's set to be notable. It is also stated in WP:MUSICBIO that NOT all notable articles must meet WP:GNG. I understand it doesn't meet WP:GNG but it meets WP:MUSICBIO.--Obari2Kay (talk) 08:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per WP:SKCRIT 2. The nom is a blocked CU confirmed sock who appears to have created and commented on AfDs for disruptive purposes. (Ironically enough the sock of the sockmaster he accuses the other uses or being controlled by.) TonyBallioni (talk) 13:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.