Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Ruston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Ruston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of a record producer, which just asserts that he exists and sources the fact to a directory entry, a glancing namecheck of his existence in a WP:BLOG entry about something else, and his commercial endorsement of a professional product. As always, a person in the music industry needs to be the subject of reliable source coverage about him in media, verifying one or more specific accomplishments that pass WP:NMUSIC, to get a Wikipedia article -- "it can be nominally verified that he exists" is not enough. Bearcat (talk) 13:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.