Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Strack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 14:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Strack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strack seems to be a WP:ROTM evangelist, displaying nothing sufficiently notable to pass WP:BIO. He's been appointed by various presidents to do various things, but nothing stands out as notable. Of the references I have checked (about half) the majority show Strack exists, or are interviews with him, or are things he has said, lending to the feeling that this is WP:ADMASQ 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing GNG. I tried looking for critical reviews of his books for AUTHOR, I can only find sites selling the books; other links are confirmation of where he works and various interviews or a website offering his services as a speaker for your event. Oaktree b (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The nominator beat me to it. Here's a table with my assessment of the sources. None contribute to WP:GNG. I haven't Googled for others.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree with Curb above. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 22:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and well, all of the above, stressing that in 2023, everyone knows that Wikipedia is non-sectarian charity, not a soap box. Bearian (talk) 21:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.