Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JediMUD (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JediMUD

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) Any Google Books mention of this title shows that it's only invoked in passing, so we're left with none of the in-depth coverage we would need to support a dedicated article. There are no worthwhile redirect targets, as List of MUDs requires each row to have its own article. czar 01:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 01:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it lacks significant notability and coverage. Would need more supporting links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericjcarrmiddletownde (talk • contribs) 16:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - MUDs almost get zero coverage from the press, so the lack of sources for this doesn't surprise me. It doesn't establish any notability and I can't see any way to redirect/merge it. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) — Preceding undated comment added 01:11, 27 November 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per the request of User:Czar.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see where this can meet WP:NGAME as mentioned by the OP, the google book hits are minor refences. Jeepday (talk) 15:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:RS concerns. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.