Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Robertson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:42, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jen Robertson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one of these three dab entries is even close to the title: Jenn Robertson, the Canadian actress. The other two are OR guesses. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep disambiguation pages make sense in sorting out possible confusion of names. I would actually advise relinking everything to Jennifer Robertson, and then using that as a disambiguation page to the 4 potential links here, and just ignoring Jean Robertson.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep this is useful disambiguation. If a person types "Jen Robertson" it is conceivable that they could be looking for any of these persons. --LukeSurl ^{t c} 10:14, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It's the title that's wrong rather than the dab, but this was a difficult one to give a title. Jenny and Jennie are both probably Jennifer on their birth certificates, but we don't know that. I rearranged the intro to make it clear this dab is for Jen, Jennie, Jenny and Jennifers. I would recommend a move to Jennifer Robertson (disambiguation), and it could still include the Jenny/Jennies as variants of the name. I used the searchbox and dabfix and added 6 new entries. There were easily another 20meeting MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 09:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.