Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenna Ware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jenna Ware

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a person who does not meet WP:GNG and doesn't fall within any of the more specific notability categories - the most applicable one is probably WP:NAUTHOR but that is also not met. All sources are primary and I cannot find any secondary sources that discuss her in any significant depth or detail. The title would be a plausible redirect to the article about her husband (Joseph F. Ware Jr.) which mentions her, but there is no content in this article that would need to be merged.

Note also that the subject of the article has asked to have it deleted; that's not sufficient reason if clear notability exists, but again, I don't see that notability does exist independently of her husband. bonadea contributions talk 09:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 09:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 09:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE and insufficient standalone sourcing. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. TheEditster (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - I don't see a need to redirect to Campus_of_Virginia_Tech#Joseph_F._Ware,_Jr._Advanced_Engineering_Lab. power~enwiki (π, ν) 14:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete cannot find any notability measure that the subject passes.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete putting up the money to found a specific lab setup in a university is almost never alone sign of notability, and that is all I see here. I would say this article should be speedy deleted because it seems to really violate the privacy of the non-public figure living person who is the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.