Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeonathan Prato
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jeonathan Prato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Could not find any coverage. Mainly primary sources provided. LibStar (talk) 23:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, while diplomats are not inherently notable, the subject was ambassador to four different nations over a decade (1960-1963, 1969-1973). I recall that we have tended to keep those articles of career diplomats who served in several positions. Bearian (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- That is not true. Being ambassador to several nations doesn't necessarily increase notability. We need significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Of course serving as an ambassador in many countries increases notability versus serving in just one country, keeping other variables constant (importance of countries, years per mission, historical events, consecutive/concurrent). gidonb (talk) 17:38, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- That is not true. Being ambassador to several nations doesn't necessarily increase notability. We need significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Historical figure. No BLP concern whatsoever. Absolutely no lack of sources! I only added a few. There's much more. gidonb (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.