Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Carl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Multiple editors cite coverage in the article's cited sources as a rationale to keep. No policy-based elaboration of "lack of notability" was provided here or for the initial proposed deletion. (non-admin closure) Rjjiii (talk) 08:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Carl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 12:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Definitely looks notable enough for me. The broken image isn't ideal, but will re-upload and substitute it for a cropped version. Biohistorian15 (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It's a bit thin - both the Washington Examiner and American Conservative are considered only so-so in terms of reliability. I don't know the reputation of the European Conservative. But there is an article in the Washington Post and the EENews is a Politico publication. Not yet in the article is Vox discussing his book. There are articles in other publications that I am not familiar with. His book is published by a lesser-known publisher, Skyhorse, but it's not self-published. Lamona (talk) 04:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Carl, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.