Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerome Lecat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jerome Lecat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Sources are a complete mess. Mix of press releases, blog, and name mentions, and own blogs. scope_creep (talk) 21:38, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. However the subject is notable but resources are not reliable. There must be a refimprove tag in-spite of a deletion tag.NANExcella (talk) 09:54, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: sources are in passing, WP:SPIP or not independent of the subject's company. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Delete per norm. Edidiong (talk) 07:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.