Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JerryPHD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JerryPHD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most the sources mention him in passing, none are significant coverage. Not a shocker for 21 year old director, but it is WP:TOOSOON for an article, which is demonstrated by the fact that the article itself is little more than a directory of his projects. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 01:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 01:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. [1] is the only reference that isn't entirely trivial. Probably WP:TOOSOON. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I agree. scope_creep (talk) 18:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indepth coverage from reliable sources. --GRuban (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails the basic notability guideline for people and is not notable under the additional criteria for creative professionals. Sam Sailor 09:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.