Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim David

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Bait30 ^Talk? 23:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jim David

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads like a promotion. I could not find any reliable sources to establish verifiability. This article has only had one citation since 2010.The only articles I could find were theater listings from local newspapers, so basically just advertisements. Bait30 ^Talk? 00:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bait30 ^Talk? 00:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Besides appearing on national TV shows and the like (already in the article) I have found several independent and reliable sources which should clear the WP:GNG hurdle. [1], [2], [3] includes just three I was able to dig up. --Jayron 32 16:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: but clear out the crap! The NYT article is enough to establish GNG, but the current wikipedia article reads like a publicity piece. WP:TNT might be a good start. Toddst1 (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.