Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim DuPlessis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Page pass WP:POLITICIAN as the subject is a sitting member of the Kentucky House of Representatives (non-admin closure) FITINDIA (talk) 21:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jim DuPlessis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources wasn't clearly understood fails Notability and GNG well as BIO. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 03:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and improve. See political notability. The subject is identified as a member of a US state legislature. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Mr. DuPlessis is a member of KY's state legislature so that alone gives him notability (political notability). In veritas (talk) 04:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for the reasons stated above. Seems pretty clear cut.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per NPOL and speedy close this Afd. This is an investment of time of volunteers that can be used in other places. The nominator needs to get their guidelines' knowledge up to speed. Lourdes 05:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN.FITINDIA (talk) 07:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow keep A member of a US state legislature is notable Neiltonks (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow keep per above. Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow keep per above also. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 09:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Obviously, per WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, meets WP:NPOL, suggest nominator has a read of WP:OUTCOMES to see what is generally seen as notable. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:57, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.